|
Judith Cushman & Associates Retained Executive Search in Communications Judy Cushman's Blog |
|
The Cushman Report To subscribe to the email version of The Cushman Report, please send a note to info@jc-a.com with "subscribe" in the Subject line. Click here to view past editions. The Cushman Report Breaking News, Trends and Information about the Communications Marketplace March 2000 Part 1 of 2 Hello again. This is Part I of the delayed first newsletter of 2000. Part II will be out the last week of March. How apropos since one observation for 2000 is about compression -- and how we are all living through the consequences of too much of a good thing. Ive had the busiest first quarter ever. Ive also been renovating a house and just held my daughters wedding in it -- while it was not quite finished. SO MUCH TO DO -- SO MUCH CHANGE A LUCRATIVE CHALLENGE FOR AGENCIES THE AGENCY MODEL -- FIX IT -- ITS BROKEN WHAT AGENCIES ARE DOING TO COPE Part II is about: WORKAHOLIC -- WHO ME? CAREER OPTIONS -- THE COMPENSATION/PACE OF NEW HIRES COMPENSATION TRENDS -- CHURN AND THE SECOND WAVE OF DOT COM HIRES COMPENSATION -- THE WORD "PACKAGE" IS TAKING ON NEW MEANING SO MUCH TO DO -- SO MUCH CHANGE What an exciting time we live in. The world is changing at lightening speed and its all about communication. We are so needed that all the rules about how to behave in the workplace to "get ahead" are changing. There is no going back to an "old style" version of normal. When I attend a technology forum and the four "guys" (about 90% of the time it is guys) are talking about their new companies attracting millions in venture capital or millions by going public -- I think, "OK, thats not unusual." Then I realize how much my values have changed. We simply are in one of the most entrepreneurial and creative moments since the industrial revolution. Skeptics are saying there will be consolidations and shakeouts that will burst the dot com bubble. Of course there will be losers in crowded markets. But the direction is unmistakably one of growth, the creation of e-commerce infrastructure and new models to sell products across all markets. The greatest successes, in my opinion, will be integrating bricks and mortar companies with on-line businesses to achieve a seamless customer experience. The Sears/AOL model is an example. What an opportunity for integrated branding and messaging! For those of us who can add value as organizations grapple with these complex issues there is no ceiling. Strategy, planning, programming and implementation can come from a variety of directions -- and the PR/Marcom discipline does not have an exclusive right to providing solutions. The stakes are so high that communications professionals will find competition coming from unexpected places. Is it time to seek alliances with management consultants, research groups, corporate identity/image advisors, database and web experts? We make a difference and we have an impact. This is the mantra for 2000. We know it. Our clients know it. Being needed is what we have wanted. Now that we are living this wonderful moment we are in pain and on the verge of spinning out of control. There is an explosion in the amount of work to be done and in the dollars available to pay for that work. The ripple effect from newly created wealth spawned by dot coms has raised compensation levels for communications/IR people across the board. The temptation to live for work and near-term gain has changed the career paradigm. (More to come on this in Part II.) A LUCRATIVE CHALLENGE FOR AGENCIES/BRANDING One of the most intriguing and potentially lucrative challenges for agencies is to develop, package and trademark a communications methodology that addresses the issues of branding and integrated message strategy. For (client) companies this is a complex and difficult task where outside counsel is needed and paid for at premium rates. How can a company use all the communications tools available to present a consistent brand, personalize it in a meaningful way to the customer, develop a relationship with that customer and present the company story to key audiences (including the media?) For an agency with an outstanding reputation as a leader in corporate messaging strategy, fees are higher (possibly on the basis of a new formula) and partially based upon meeting or exceeding specific benchmarks. Agency principals are selling out, getting richer, retiring and leaving the businesses they founded. This puts an additional financial burden on the firm, as new owners must generate revenue to pay founders their buyout price (leaving less in the till for staff salaries). Usually, the parent is a bigger firm with a more structured (perhaps top down?) culture. The honeymoon lasts for about one year, then the parent starts to exert control over its acquired firm, usually a more free-spirited and flexible organization. When that happens, what made the firm so special fades and top performers go elsewhere. This is the situation throughout our industry. Agency services are gradually becoming commoditized and agencies are becoming highly vulnerable to competition. Savvy new business prospects are questioning the value proposition. One recently acquired agency is run so much more efficiently than the parent, that it can afford salaries that are 30% higher than the parent and still report higher profits. Think about the management and internal parity issues that raises. The largest agencies are too top heavy, insulated and infrastructure-bound to institute fundamental restructuring -- if that is what it takes to prosper. These entities will be the last to respond to market imperatives. THE AGENCY MODEL -- FIX IT -- ITS BROKEN While there is more business than agencies can handle, inadequate staff is choking growth. Finding, hiring and retaining staff is the issue of the year. There are fundamental structural and financial reasons for this problem. Agencies are the most seriously impacted segment by the wealth appreciation strategy offered to communications professionals by dot coms. The agency model is a fee for services structure with hourly wages paid on a scale commensurate with years of experience and expertise. Historically, agencies have feared the forays of corporate raiders who could offer their talented up and comers lucrative and stable posts. The gap in compensation between the two, coupled with a different (less stressful) work ethic usually proved irresistible. Now, the siren song is coming from start-ups offering high risk, high reward packages. It has proved to be an unstoppable force, depleting the ranks of agency (middle-level to Director) practitioners. Firms are becoming, de facto, the training ground or masters program for bright, young Account Executives. Once initiated, they move on. An agency head said he expected to keep an A/E for about two years. The cost of maintaining staff is escalating to the point where it is seriously eroding profit margins. There are several factors: the cost of the new hire in a highly competitive market (can these be passed along to the client?), the cost of replacement in management time, staff training, the strain on other members of the team to fill in the gaps, and human resource budgets (either internal staff and/or recruitment fees). WHAT AGENCIES ARE DOING TO COPE Innovative, independent agencies are embarking upon vastly different strategies to compete for and retain talent. Work/Home Life Balance: One firm (not in Silicon Valley) decided that what mattered was the balance between work and home life. After a careful analysis of the cost to replace a valued employee, the agency instituted a retention/benefits program. It included three months off with pay (at the end of four years of employment) along with an elaborate series of personal learning benefits and health fringes. Even in the first year of work there was a month of paid vacation and personal days (that could be used for illness or time off as needed.) The program was well crafted to reflect the values of the founder. The firm encourages a normal 40-hour work week and intervenes to fix a problem if an employee is regularly staying late. Creating Wealth/Going Public: Several firms are looking at the issue of taking themselves public -- in essence, becoming a startup. Key employees are being offered stock, which could soon be extremely valuable. It will be interesting to see how the market values an organization whose assets are people, not products. For an innovative, independent agency that has been effective branding/positioning itself as a "winner" there could be excellent upside potential. A stock purchase program could be instituted for all employees, while the most senior members of the agency achieve "key employee" status. It would be an excellent retention strategy especially if there were a relatively short (achievable) vesting program. Im sure well see this strategy implemented in the next few months. Creating Wealth/Stock in Lieu of Full Fees: Another approach is to take a stock position rather than a full fee from a client in a high growth mode. The stock could be priced at a pre-IPO level, or as a relatively new public company. A formula would be worked out to define the value of pre-IPO stock. One firm takes 20% of its fee this way. In order not to penalize agency staff (if they didnt happen to work on the most lucrative account) profit from stock is pooled and an across the board average determines the pay-out. Creating Wealth/A Venture Fund: Establishing a venture fund from company profits and sharing the profits (assuming there are profits) is yet another program to generate wealth. Companies selected could be a mix of clients as well as recommendations from employees. This fits the model for longer-term gain with a high degree of risk and reward. Creating Wealth/Partnerships: Sharing the business with key employees by granting minor partnership status with stock purchased over several years encourages stability. Those shares of stock have vesting clauses that state, if the company were sold, the stock would immediately become fully vested. This arrangement would encourage stability in a time of uncertainty. Creating Wealth/Salary Increases Directly Tied to Client Billing: For the smaller agency -- this is an attractive incentive. It allows an ambitious professional to work within the security of an organization to grow the business and reap the benefits from increased client billing. One agency owner established base line performance goals and billings to justify a starting salary, then outlined specific financial rewards for increased client revenue, client retention (contract renewal) and new business acquisition. The formula was complex, paid immediately and mutually beneficial. If the newly hired manager were successful, earnings could increase by 20% within 6-months. |
|
Judith Cushman & Associates 15600 NE 8th St., Suite B1, PMB 178, Bellevue, WA 98008 s (425) 392-8660 Fax (425) 746-8629jcushman@jc-a.com s www.jc-a.com The Judith Cushman & Associates web team would appreciate feedback concerning this site. Please e-mail your comments, questions and suggestions to heathers@jc-a.com. |
|
|
Copyright © 2007 JJG&R Communications Services, Inc. |
|