|
Judith Cushman & Associates Retained Executive Search in Communications Judy Cushman's Blog |
|
The Cushman Report To subscribe to the email version of The Cushman Report, please send a note to info@jc-a.com with "subscribe" in the Subject line. Click here to view past editions. The Cushman Report Breaking News, Trends and Information about the Communications Marketplace February 2001 First newsletter of 2001 -- and it's all the about the market shift which I have been watching carefully before writing this issue. I'll continue to monitor the corporate sector for signals that short-term job freezes and reduced spending are continuing or that the trend is moving toward moderate growth. I ask several important questions about changing jobs in times of uncertainty and the key is, "How much risk are you willing to take?" Judy THE PULSE OF THE MARKET; EARLY 2001 THE TALENT WARS -- A NATIONAL FORUM THE PULSE OF THE MARKET; EARLY 2001 The End of the Dot Com Boom and the Beginning of the Pendulum Swing When we counted down to the end of 2000 and the start of 2001, I had a sense of a market turn as sharp and as swift as a Chinese cleaver cutting through steak. Within the first week of the New Year, all of the major high-tech corporate clients (not dot coms) we had been representing put their searches on hold. The dot com shakeout was having a ripple effect and the economic warnings and uncertainty with the new administration added to the jitters. If this reaction werent so potentially chilling, it would have been amusing. Given the speed at which information is exchanged and the ability of senior corporate officers to impose hiring freezes across the board, this stroke was a signal of fiscal responsibility and conservatism. It was also one of the easier decisions to make in terms of the toll it would take on operations and strategy. If the perception is that the market is in a period of slight correction, then the freeze can be lifted with little damage to the momentum of the company. During these cautionary periods, procedures are in place to make exceptions for critical hiring needs. Ive been chatting recently with friends in top agencies (with a mix of technology clients in the Business to Business and Business to Consumer space). They have reacted with a short-term strategy to this abrupt change in the business climate. Agencies have found, not surprisingly, that competition has returned. Last year start-ups would line up outside the door and ask to present their credentials so that agencies might consider taking them on. Agencies were routinely charging $50-$60K per month retainers and finding they barely had the staff to provide adequate service. If a mediocre person were available, s/he would be snatched up. In a conversation I had with a corporate manager, he said that he was brought on to replace a top tier agency receiving those fees -- fees that the company felt were completely out of line for the services provided. One agency VP said that the firm was just asked to compete for a new client and was told there would be four other contenders. By the time the presentation was due, the potential client had invited ten firms to bid for its business. Last year, that client would have been happy to find one firm that could take its business -- without having to wait. Budgets are coming down -- The monthly retainers companies are willing to pay under new contracts are being slashed dramatically. One executive mentioned the numbers were half of what they were last year, and the potential client expected a similar level of service as had been provided in richer times. Considering how competitive salaries and benefits are, maintaining profitable operations is becoming a daunting challenge. Agencies/Staffing -- Last year every agency was in a hiring mode. Recruitment and retention were the universal challenges and agencies were hiring in house human resource executives to focus on recruitment or redirecting HR staffs to address those needs as best they could. That has turned around. Most of the firms I talked with said they were fully staffed. In fact there have been scattered layoffs where firms were heavily dependent on dot com business or where the management was lax in monitoring expenditures. (The comments I have heard indicate that if an outstanding candidate becomes available, the firm will move quickly to hire that individual, especially at the upper middle ranks -- generally a supervisor.) There are agencies still aggressively hiring. Those are the firms, in many cases, who were not able to rise to the challenge of marketplace competition. They have had a history of not offering sufficiently attractive compensation packages, or their processes were too slow or they were not perceived as a top tier employer (for a variety of reasons). There may be a short window in the first quarter for these organizations to recruit talent and take advantage of a softening market. Plan for Slowdowns -- So far, no agencies have yet to mention significant cutbacks of existing contracts. However, my sense is that budgets supporting marketing initiatives that are up for renewal will be carefully scrutinized and trimmed -- if at all possible. The exceptions will be in those highly competitive segments where the agency is integral to a momentum building strategy, or in niches that are not experiencing slowdowns. It would be prudent for agencies to be financially conservative and curb expenditures based on anticipated budget reductions and watch for signals from existing clients. So far, corporations are demonstrating fiscal prudence by imposing hiring freezes and limiting increases in overhead. Should the economy more severely impact these companies, existing outside services will be cut followed by tighter controls on discretionary internal expenditures. As we wait out the economic uncertainty, base salary figures will stay where they are. In fact, toward the end of the third quarter salaries that had been creeping up fell back and stabilized at mid summer levels. With companies demanding the same service for half the retainers charged, there is no way agencies can afford to increase base salaries. Increases will come in the form of performance-based incentives tied to profitability or contributions to increased revenue. For those organizations able to take advantage of this market, the time is right to search for excellent candidates. These are the top performers who were wooed to exciting startups that have run out of funding or that have decided not to go public. Too energized to sit on a bench, these producers are ready to move, but not to repeat last years mistake. The Market for Excellent Performers and the Value of the Function Remain Intact Competition is back and jobs are harder to secure, although there are and will always be options for excellent performers. One of the permanent attitude changes in this post-dot com era (the result of start-ups competing for market-attention) is an embedded sense of the importance of PR in the ranks of corporate general management -- from marketing VPs to CFOs to chief executives. A good media strategist/doer, an investor relations professional who can point to significant results in the general business/financial press or top tier trade publications is, quite simply, in demand, despite all cautionary notes. Management has learned a lesson through this era of dot com hype: that PR is the tool of choice to raise awareness and establish competitive advantage. Another lesson that wont be unlearned by hiring organizations is that speed is a success factor in winning first choice candidates. The hiring process is intended to move swiftly. Once the first interviews occur, expect the entire cycle to finish within three weeks. (During the height of last years hiring frenzy, the decision could be made within just a few days.) An advantage for the companies that are operating counter-cyclical to the general slowdown is the ability to pick and choose among several fully qualified candidates. What can you do if you need a job during times of market hesitation? If you are one of the unfortunate casualties of the dot com shakeout, take heart. There are still options. But dont expect to contact three good friends and say you are open to new situations and wait for the offers to roll in. Those days are gone -- and, I hope, gone for good, because they were unhealthy and set unrealistic expectations about a job seekers value. Its essential to realize that being prepared for the interview means doing your homework and being motivated about contributing -- instead of asking, "Whats in it for me?" For job seekers with strong track records (the definition of which, in an era of frequent job changes, is the subject of another column) there is no reason to panic. There are good jobs -- although instead of four offers there may just be two to consider. The high risk, high reward world of startups has shrunk to companies with more modest but achievable business objectives. The communications professionals who joined start-ups only to find that statistics dont lie, and most fail, have discovered they really do need to earn a regular wage. Making mortgage payments is a real issue and returning to traditional jobs is right for them. At this moment, opportunities on the corporate side appear to be somewhat limited, especially in technology. There are exceptions in e-commerce/Internet infrastructure companies including telecom. The consumer/tech sector is hard hit, however, with the exception of gaming and entertainment. Biotech is still healthy. If youre considering a job change, ask yourself these questions:
If youre actively searching, consider the following:
No doubt, these times "they are a changing" and no one is yet prepared to say if we are headed for a soft landing or a stomach-churning thud. Stay tuned for the next newsletter. THE TALENT WARS -- A NATIONAL FORUM Last December, I was one of two recruiters chosen to discuss "Talent Wars Still Top of Mind in the Corporate Communications Landscape," in a conference call orchestrated by a DC-based Public Affairs Group--Best Practices in Corporate Communications. Excerpts were published recently in PR News. Here are my answers to several of the questions posed by moderator Edie Fraser. Q. What do the best CANDIDATES bring to the table? A. Some things dont change when it comes to explaining why a top notch VP is successful. I call it "getting to the simple." It is a wonderful ability to look at a complex situation with a communications filter, understand the business goals from a CEO perspective, and then distill the situation analysis into maybe three or four key strategic points. Finally it is the tenacity and clarity to keep the issue focused for the CEO. I have seen so many senior [executives] value that beyond anything -- particularly in crisis communications or other business life and death situations. It is the ability to synthesize, define the key points and crystallize an issue. This is a priceless and universally valued talentpossessed by too few in the profession. Q. What should HIRING MANAGERS be prepared to bring to the table? A. (Here is the comment of the second recruiter, Bill Heyman) There must be a career path focus. One of the first things that well say to the client (hiring manager) is, "Where does the job go from here?" The more enlightened companies interview on the basis of where the person they are about to hire will be in their second promotion within an organization. (I felt that that answer was not in tune with the reality of the West Coast market, particularly high tech. Here is my response.) A counterpoint to this perspective is that were in a world of change. In a technologically-oriented and/or fast-growth [market] we work in an environment where companies groom themselves to change ownership, to restructure, to go from public to private and private to public. Career planning takes on new meaning. The relevant question is "What skill sets am I developing? What accomplishments can I point to? How marketable will I be EITHER within the company or outside the organization?" In younger organizations that have not stabilized, you have to factor in what the company may look like a year or two from now and recognize that that organization may not want you or vice versa. Q. Is there a general movement more toward performance-based bonuses? A. Its a double-edged sword. If you are going to switch to performance-based work, you have to meet a minimum base salary figure to recruit. While people want to take a performance-based approach to a job they are, on the other hand, looking at making a mortgage. People say they are willing to step up to the challenge of performance-based [compensation], but only to a point. That is exactly why recruiting in the whole dot com world has changed. Everybody was willing to take risks as long as there was only an up side. All of a sudden, people are finding out that there really is a significant downside to the tune of about 75% fallout. People are going right back to where they were before and say, "Im not that kind of person; Im happy to be back in a more normal environment. Im also happy to work toward some performance incentives, but Im not going to put my whole salary at risk. I cant ask my family to sacrifice their lifestyle." Q. Talent wars are ongoing, and many companies are now experiencing the post-honeymoon period following a merger or acquisition. As such, it seems the internal communications function is more important than ever for change management. Are companies recruiting more candidates to fill this role? A. On the West Coast I would say that what I have seen on the internal communications side is not action, but only a growing awareness of the function. So many young companies are driven by market factors, that their focus -- everything -- is external. This lack of interest in committing substantive resources to internal communications must change. What will force the change is the issue of retention. Young companies will begin to understand that improving their internal communications function is essential to keeping valued employees. Our firm has become increasingly aware of the complex decision making involved in a job change. I mentioned we wanted to create a new section on our web site devoted to the personal issues surrounding career decisions. We are calling it the Family Life/Work Issues Web Site. It is up as of today and can only be described as a beginning effort. We organized it in sections: (1) Questions and Comments from our Readers (Including a Bulletin Board for questions and responses which are posted by our webmaster), (2) Personal Reflections, Articles and Essays and (3) Regional and National Resources. The Personal Reflections section is where general comments/observations from our readers can be found. The bulletin board is where we post questions and answers anonymously on any topic that a subscriber wishes to explore. The Resources section provides web site addresses to put you on the path of public information through universities, government entities and associations that address specific issues, such as children with disabilities, as well as books and other tools. Each month we will focus on one issue and ask for comments, suggestions and personal experiences that offer insights. Of course, any se-mail that are helpful about other family issues will be posted. The first broad topic is "Caregiving for Loved Ones." Our readers are concerned about childcare options as well as finding the best support services for elderly relatives. Again, we welcome any ideas about topics of interest. Confidentiality is an issue that concerns us and here is our policy on the subject. All e-mails to Judith Cushman & Associates are considered confidential. No names or e-mail addresses will be posted either by the person raising a question or offering a comment. If the individual sending an e-mail says that his/her address/contact information may be listed, we will consider posting it. However, our initial assumption is that ALL e-mails are NOT for attribution. We assume all e-mails we receive can be posted. Each comment or question that we post will have a code number identifying it so that JC&A knows who these e-mails are from. If the person offering a response is available to exchange personal information (in addition to what is posted on the bulletin board) with the individual raising the question we would like to know that. We will then contact the initiator of the question and determine if that individual would care to be identified so the contacts may continue off-line. I do not know how time-consuming this process may become. If we develop better procedures, we will announce any changes on the site. |
|
Judith Cushman & Associates 15600 NE 8th St., Suite B1, PMB 178, Bellevue, WA 98008 s (425) 392-8660 Fax (425) 746-8629jcushman@jc-a.com s www.jc-a.com The Judith Cushman & Associates web team would appreciate feedback concerning this site. Please e-mail your comments, questions and suggestions to heathers@jc-a.com. |
|
|
Copyright © 2007 JJG&R Communications Services, Inc. |
|