Judith Cushman & Associates

Retained Executive Search in Communications

Judy Cushman's Blog

The Cushman Report

To subscribe to the email version of The Cushman Report, please send a note to info@jc-a.com with "subscribe" in the Subject line.  Click here to view past editions.

The Cushman Report

Breaking News, Trends and Information about

the Communications Marketplace

December 1999


This newsletter is all about the future:

A PARADIGM SHIFT

THE VISION IS IRRESISTIBLE

VALUATION--LOOK AT PROCESS NOT PROFIT

WHAT THE EXPERTS FORECAST

MY OPINIONS

INDUSTRY SHIFTS AND TRENDS — more to come in January 


The Last Newsletter of the Millennium

So here we are at the end and the beginning. At first I thought this report would be all about Comdex but I realized, literally in a flash of understanding, that Comdex is about the past and occupies very little mindspace or strategic significance. Comdex was lackluster this year and my sense is, it will continue to be a show with a limited focus, and second tier significance. So, this newsletter is all about the future and what I have gleaned from experts--along with my speculations.

A PARADIGM SHIFT

We enter the millennium governed by a fundamental paradigm shift. It is a shift not only in how we communicate but in our expectation about the way we conduct business and how we should be treated as customers. Expectation and reality are still a significant distance apart, but it is only a matter of time before the pieces are in place for the vision to become a reality.

This is an amazingly creative period as we rush to invent, construct and establish viable business models around the Internet. We do not have time for linear progression. I think of the analogy between e-commerce and an adolescent child--experiencing growth spurts that affect different parts of the body, creating short-term angst and confusion. In the end though, we know it will all fit together and the gangly, manic and awkward teenager will mature into a functioning, coordinated human being.

TOP

THE VISION IS IRRESISTIBLE

The vision for e-commerce is so powerful and the rewards potentially so great that inventors and entrepreneurs, who are driven by an instinct to ride this wave, cannot deny this imperative. To demand, for example, that Jeff Bezos slow down (and focus on making money) would be the ultimate frustration. He is rushing at top speed to build a global e-commerce brand/business model that satisfies customer needs—for any product, at any time. The stakes are so high and the potential win is so significant, that the idea of meeting normal shareholder demand for tangible value seems entirely secondary. (BTW, I wrote this before Jeff was named TIME Magazine’s Man of the Year.)

A recent FORTUNE article (among others) talks about valuations of dot coms and bemoans the irrationality and inflated pricing of stocks. There is a sense that investors could pull the plug at any moment and the house of cards would come tumbling down. The argument goes that these companies are totally vulnerable to market perception, not supported by sound fundamentals. I think we have old thinking here.

The market "guesstimates" the value of companies on intangibles—certainly not on normal earnings ratios or potential for profitable sales. The reality is we can’t know what is unknowable. Yet we all know there will be big winners. It is simply impossible to be sure. And, being sure is what the old model is all about. It’s time to take a seat on the roller coaster and hang on until the ride is over.

TOP

LOOK AT PROCESS NOT PROFIT

Participating in this paradigm shift is about living though the transition and taking risks. Measures of success at this moment are about process, not results. Is there a sound strategy, good technology, visionary management, bias toward results, customer and sales wins? Are there sufficient financial resources to sustain the company while it builds its business model and loses money? Fortunately, it seems the market abounds with eager and moneyed risk takers who perceive the same potential as the leaders of these start-ups. The opinions of traditional analysts appear quite frankly, irrelevant and beside the point. This is a moment where the market is simply ungovernable and beyond the ability of "insiders" to make or break a company.

With that said, let me relay relevant forecasts from two meetings I recently attended in the Seattle area, one about the future of telecommunications hosted by the MIT Forum and the other by the Washington Software Alliance. The WSA sponsors an annual "Predictions" dinner each December.

TOP

WHAT THE EXPERTS FORECAST

  • Privacy Issues are "hot" and will get hotter

  • The web will escape the computer and move with us into cars and devices. What will web sites look like (on small screens or personal productivity tools)?

  • Portals will be personalized—just like Nike personalized sneakers

  • Trading stock mania will continue. There can be an infinite number of buyers and sellers as electronic facilitation (as in the E-Bay auction model) creates large markets of buyers and sellers, eliminating middlemen. The volatility of stocks can and is being fueled by press releases flooding the market (just for the purpose of creating a "buzz" about a company.) Microsoft will spin off its games business, going public to participate in this "action."

  • Violence will spread into our industry as people respond to the immense amount of pressure we are putting people under

  • Intellectual property patents attempting to protect the "absurd" (as in the Amazon "one click" patent that it won) will continue, creating questions about what can and cannot be protected in the on-line world

  • On-line voting can happen creating the potential for more electorate participation than ever (but how do we enable access for all?)

  • There will be shakeouts in dot com companies. There will only be one dot com pet store left.

  • Amazon will loose 550 million and look for a buyer in 2000

  • The most unique products will use wireless application protocols (WAP) e.g. digital cameras already can send pictures over the internet to be downloaded as 35mm prints, instantly. (This is just the tip of the iceberg.)

  • The battle between the TV vs. the PC will disappear and the couch potato will win. All appliances will turn into TVs. Cellular will win out over the handheld PDA. Everything will be in the phone. (Here is where there are absolute disagreements about the need for one appliance versus several personal communications devices that each do a specialized function very well)

  • Wireless explodes with growth in both handheld devices and cell-phones. (The difference of opinions continues here.)

  • International trade will eventually be open, free, without restrictions but that won’t be the case initially as countries try to hold back the flood with barriers that will eventually give way

  • 100% uptime will become the #1 priority for e-commerce sites. Outages simply will not be accepted as consumers expect totally reliable, transaction-safe performance. The government may jump in to regulate performance. The battle for control has just begun.

  • All the marketing/branding/messaging focus needs to be customer-centric. It will be harder and harder to build customer loyalty since moving on is as easy as one click away.

  • Microsoft will pay for its past behavior with fines, by unbundling the browser and in publishing its pricing strategy. Another forecast—MS will divide into separate businesses.

  • The Internet stock bubble will continue to froth in 2000.

  • Big will combine to get bigger (e.g. portals, end to end e-commerce solutions, combining bricks and mortar with e-commerce businesses)

  • Portals will be customized. Otherwise consumers will go directly to their favorite sites as access becomes easier and as they feel more comfortable navigating the web.

  • This is a good year for "glue" manufacturers—meaning timing is critical for building infrastructure. Business to business information exchange must be standardized if e-commerce is to take off. The existing standard EDI (Electronic Data Interchange) must be replaced. Will the new standard be XML? Whatever is selected, time is of the essence.

  • Cell phones will be the drivers of choice to the Internet. It is the ubiquitous personal tool. In `99, 33 million PCs were connected to the Internet while there were 76 million wireless subscribers. The number of subscribers is expected to reach one billion by 2002, a year earlier than originally forecast. Two compelling reasons why the phone "wins"--it is always on and it is always with you. Another important factor, phones are replaced on average every 12-months while computers remain on desktops or with owners from two to four years. Upgrades and legacy issues are much less of a problem if the "shelf life" is only one year.

  • Sprint and Amazon have joined forces to offer a service to allow on-line shopping from a cell phone. However, it is slow and costly and the customer experience is likely to discourage repeat shopping. From a business perspective this is not a significant trend. From a marketing perspective, it is a very smart strategy to be first.

  • To the consumer, infrastructure issues are relatively unimportant—the operating system, the hardware and the WAP (Wireless Application Protocol)—as long as it all works.

  • For the entrepreneur, right now, fortunes are being made by starting businesses that solve infrastructure problems. Plumbing has never been exciting, but it is essential.

  • The ease of access and availability of information raise important social issues. How do we protect privacy? How do we deal with children who now have TVs in their rooms and who soon will be able to go on-line as easily as turning on the TV? Will specific economic, social and ethnic groups in our society have equal access to the Internet if they don’t now? Will, for example, low income African Americans or Hispanics find ways, as net access becomes more ubiquitous, to go online-- or will they remain economically disadvantaged if they cannot connect? Can we avoid creating a society of information have and have-nots?

  • While on-line retailers are clamoring for more bandwidth to enrich the shopping experience, there is another market imperative as web access moves to handheld devices. These personal devices have limited ability to download information and small display screens. Web sites will evolve to offer a spectrum of experiences varying from light to full flavor—with the visitor choosing whichever one is appropriate.

  • Handheld devices will find niche applications, such as checking for sports results, stock activity and wagering. Businesses will use these tools for real time communication and data exchange with employees "in the field."

  • Europe is ahead of us in the use of wireless technology to share voice and data messages. They have evolved to a universal standard while our market is fragmented. In Europe, two billion messages per month are exchanged. Recipients can reply to e-mails with short voice messages or tap out a response using the phone keypad. Cost for data transmission is very inexpensive compared to phone calls. In the US we have not yet figured out a business model that allows phone companies to make a profit on data transmission.

  • Wireless data access will happen and once we can rely on it, cell phone usage will double from an average of 100 to 200 minutes per month.

  • The Bluetooth initiative announced at Comdex is a low powered radio system that allows appliances to talk to each other. This is an attempt to promote a standard to facilitate wireless data exchange. This initiative, if successful, can have tremendous impact on the wireless industry.

  • Personal productivity devices will not merge. Functions for voice and calendaring, for example, require different tools. Phones are getting smaller and smaller (and the market wants that) while checking e-mail and looking up appointments require a larger screen and the ability to input data. As long as devices talk to each other, there is no need for just one tool that compromises functionality for the sake of convenience.

  • Who owns the wireless customer? The general consensus was the carrier does, as the only common point of contact.

  • Eventually, industry consolidations will leave only two or three competing wireless carriers (that are not compatible), but each will have a robust national network

  • Wireless in the next year will be about simple transactions—good communication between the desktop and cell phone—low bandwidth applications, e-mail, stock and travel—and the emergence of two national data networks, Sprint and ? (not AT&T).

TOP

MY OPINIONS

  • At one of these meetings, a gentleman in the audience made this telling comment. He said, "I tried to use my cell phone in the Seattle area and I hit dead spots. Transmission even here was unreliable. How can you expect to conduct business, sell stock, etc., if you can’t count on the connection?"

  • We must, with all the excitement around the potential for e-commerce, keep our feet firmly on the ground and remember the marketplace will adopt what works and what is easy to use. When engineers designed PCs and came out with sophisticated new features, they were dismayed to learn most users only tapped 15% of the potential of their machines.

  • As we expand e-commerce to the consumer/retail marketplace, the challenge is ease of use. Instead of sophisticated new features, the direction is to make the infrastructure invisible. Also, I think only the (male) technology early adopters will want to carry around several personal productivity devices. I can’t imagine that many women will find room or have any interest in weighing down their purses with several electronic tools. Nor from a practical perspective can I envision how a person "on the go" will be able to receive information from three sources (or more). As human beings we have absorption limitations. (I know there are information junkies reading this who find it hard to believe.)

  • Just using cell phones in cars, for example, is the cause of numerous accidents. Legislation to ban cell phone use while driving is being considered in several states. For the near term, I think the consumer will choose the functions that are most important and select the device that meets his/her needs.

  • Voice technology, though several years away, will lead to a breakthrough in the use of personal productivity devices. From Comdex `98 to `99, I saw significant improvement in this category. One new program allowed the user to ask questions and have a conversation (with the personable female operator) that included learning how to use the software. A "killer" application will be the ability to request e-mail messages, have them read to you and then reply verbally. If I could dictate this newsletter from anywhere and send it to my office via voice command for editing, I’d snap up the software in a minute.

  • A limitation of PDAs is the screen itself. One of my clients has developed, for commercial use, a device that directs an image to the eye, eliminating the need for a screen. The company is also exploring the use of this technology for the consumer market. In the next decade I am convinced we will be sharing information anywhere, anytime in the format we choose.

TOP

CHANGES IN THE INDUSTRY

I’ll be talking in the next newsletter about what I see happening to our industry as a result of the e-commerce revolution. Here are highlights.

  • Clear differentiation between a Fortune 500 career track and the new options in start-ups. The impactful jobs in communications will be leading startups through the first five years of their lives. The characteristics that account for career success with on-line companies are a mind and skill-set that are just now being defined and recognized.

  • While there will be dot com failures, opportunities abound to take a risk at all levels of the business chain—from infrastructure to retail products. The market will not cool down.

  • Demand for PR and communications people will not abate this year. Salaries will escalate in the 10-20% range but the big carrots are options (which are becoming more creative) and other fringes.

  • The High Tech PR/Communications work force is dividing into an older, more mature segment with specific values relating to balance and a group of under 35 year olds (generally) who are ready to sacrifice their personal lives to play the game and win.

  • The communications challenge will be about branding and positioning. It will impact pure e-commerce businesses as well as companies merging brick and mortar/with an on-line persona. For senior level professionals capable of developing integrated messaging campaigns, the market is red-hot (for their talents). I cannot imagine how high compensation packages will go for this expertise. These folks will be the "stars" of our industry.

  • The biggest change in the next decade will be the demise of the traditional agency structure and the creation of new compensation formulas. The business model is simply too fragile to withstand the pressures of these forces: 1) The cost of doing business (to run agencies profitably), 2) the departure (through mergers) of the first generation of high tech agency founders (or their early burnout), 3) the failure of founders to develop an exit strategy, and 4) competition from new directions.

  • Agencies will devise new pricing strategies based upon value and results. Their ability to retain employees will be dependent upon new billing formulas (to be able to afford to retain staff) and incentive programs that create long-term reasons for key employees to stay. Agencies will offer employees more flexibility and support, as a matter of policy, to meet their personal scheduling needs. The workplace will become more humane in an effort to retain staff.

  • Companies will continue to struggle with the paradigm shift and their loss of control of the hiring process. While they have experienced the pain of rejection, they have not yet translated that into effective policy or behavioral changes—to attract outstanding candidates. Conversations still begin with what the company wants and expects. The process needs to become more balanced between the needs of the candidate and the hiring manager.

TOP

Jobs     Blog     Our Services     Career Advice    About JC&A     Home

 

Judith Cushman & Associates

15600 NE 8th St., Suite B1, PMB 178, Bellevue, WA 98008 s (425) 392-8660 Fax (425) 746-8629
jcushman@jc-a.com
s www.jc-a.com

The Judith Cushman & Associates web team would appreciate feedback concerning this site.

          Please e-mail your comments, questions and suggestions to heathers@jc-a.com.

Copyright © 2007 JJG&R Communications Services, Inc.